Skip Navigation
Regional News
It essentially kicks the can down the road 11 years away to 2022.

Pressure mounts over political redistricting in NY

Listen to this story
Senate Republicans and Democrats argued over the issue of redrawing new district lines yesterday. Many Republicans campaigned last November on promises to put the politically charged process of redistricting into the hands of an independent commission. As Karen Dewitt reports, pressure is mounting on the Senate GOP to follow through.

Hear this

Download audio

Share this

Explore this

Reported by

Karen DeWitt
NYS Capitol Correspondent

Senate Republicans approved a plan that would change the state’s constitution to require that new district lines be drawn by a non –partisan commission. Senate sponsor John Bonacic says he picked up the bill from previous sponsors in earlier decades because it’s the most comprehensive solution.

“I thought it was pure, it was simple, it was independent it was bi partisan,” said Bonacic. “It’s as truthful as we can get when it comes to drawing lines for redistricting.”

But changing the state’s constitution requires the votes of two consecutively elected state legislatures, and then approval by the voters in a general election. The earliest that the constitutional changes could take place would be in November 2013. That’s long after the 2012 deadline for drawing new district lines that will be in place for the next decade.

Dick Dadey, with the reform group Citizens Union, says that’s too little too late.

“It essentially kicks the can down the road 11 years away to 2022,” said Dadey. “We need redistricting reform now.”

Citizens Union has joined with other reform groups and prominent individuals, including several GOP lawmakers, to push for the reforms this year. 

The Census Bureau requires the redrawing of districts every ten years.  In past redistricting efforts, Republicans who led the Senate, and Democrats who dominate the Assembly, have each drawn their own district lines, favoring the parties in power in each house.

The Assembly’s Republican Leader, Brian Kolb, who is in the minority in that house with Republicans holding 51 seats to the Democrat’s 99, says that arrangement has greatly altered the area he represents over the years, as Democrats changed the boundaries of his Assembly district to benefit Assembly Democrats in neighboring districts and minimize the power of Republicans. Kolb says when he first became an Assemblyman, his district was contiguous, and the largely rural area took less than an hour to cross by car. Now, with the redistricting of 2002, that’s changed. His district now careens through five counties and the drive across the district now takes two and a half hours.

“It’s a crazy district,” Kolb said.

During the past few decades, the number of Republicans in the state has dwindled, while the number of Democrats has grown. The Senate GOP has also had to resort to increasing contortions to keep Republican Senators in power.  Senator Diane Savino, a Democrat whose district encompasses Staten Island and Brooklyn, jokes that she has to cross the city’s most expensive toll bridge, the Verrazano, to travel throughout her district. But she says more importantly, her attention is divided among distinctly different neighborhoods.

“It’s unfair,” Savino said.

Democrats, on the floor of the Senate, tried to bring to the floor alternative bills to achieve the redistricting reform sooner, but were rebuffed. Senator Michael Gianaris, who sponsors a bill similar to Governor Andrew Cuomo’s, that would require non partisan redistricting, accused Senate Republicans of breaking a signed campaign pledge that they would reform redistricting for the current cycle.

“I just want to be clear that this concurrent resolution does not satisfy that promise,” said Gianaris.

Democrats held the Senate for two years, from 2008 through 2010.

During that time they failed to muster support for an independent restricting commission. Dadey, with Citizen’s Union, says if Senate Democrats had approved a constitutional amendment, then the current elected legislature could have passed it this year, voters could have voted in November, and the constitutional change WOULD be in place in time for redistricting.  He says because of the Democrats’ failure, government reform groups have resorted to their plan B- pushing for a legislative solution instead.

“It was disappointingly not addressed,” said Dadey. “Which is why we now have to resort to a legislation- only strategy.”

Senate Republicans say the legislative solution would present it’s own constitutional problems, an argument Dadey and other reforms call a “red herring”.

Senate sponsor Bonacic says the constitutional amendment voted on Monday does not preclude an agreement to reform redistricting sooner.

Visitor comments


NCPR is supported by:

This is a Visitor-Supported website.