Skip Navigation
Regional News
The NY Court of Appeals hearing a case. Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tracy_collins/4013177108/">Tracy COllins</a>, Creative Commons, some rights reserved
The NY Court of Appeals hearing a case. Photo: Tracy COllins, Creative Commons, some rights reserved

No consensus on raising judicial retirement age to 80

Listen to this story
A proposal on the November ballot to allow some judges to serve until they are 80 years old is not drawing a lot of support. One court expert says that's a shame.

Hear this

Download audio

Share this


Explore this

Reported by

Karen DeWitt
NYS Capitol Correspondent
The last of six proposals on the November ballot asks whether some judges in the state should be allowed to keep their jobs until the age of 80. The current mandatory retirement age for State Supreme Court judges and judges on the state’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, is age 70. Supreme Court Judges are permitted under current law to continue serving additional two year terms, until the age of 76, if they are deemed competent and it’s demonstrated that they are needed on the bench. But Court of Appeals judges have to leave at age 70, sometimes long before their 14 year terms expire.
 
Vince Bonventre, an Albany Law School professor and expert on the state’s court system, calls the current mandatory retirement age “moronic.” And he says judges with lots of experience are better.
 
 “Our best judges literally are at their best when when they are 70 years old, and yet we force them to retire,” Bonventre said.  “I really think that’s crazy.”
 
Most judges in New York agree with Bonventre.
 
But some are against the proposal, including the reform group Citizens Union, which is advising a no vote. The group’s Dick Dadey says the amendment is poorly structured and is unequal because it does not apply to all judges in the state.
 
“If we want to increase the age for all judges in New York State then we should do it for all,” Dadey said.” And not just for a very small segment of them.”
 
Dadey says the legislation is the result of a legislative compromise. He says his group is not against judges over 70 keeping their jobs. Citizens Union says it would be better to go to the drawing board, and propose a more comprehensive amendment that also addresses the problem of too few judges in the overburdened lower courts, including Family Court.
 
Cuomo, who has said in the past that he does not support the amendment to allow some judges to stay on the bench until age 80, more recently said he hasn’t taken a position.
 
“It’s not my referendum,” Cuomo said. “I understand the issue. I think there are serious questions raised by it.”
 
If the proposal fails, several judges would have to retire from the state’s highest court. Cuomo would get to appoint their replacements. If the governor wins re-election in 2014, he has the potential to appoint every one of the seven judges on the court.  
 

Visitor comments

on:

NCPR is supported by:

This is a Visitor-Supported website.